Search for: "TRAINER WORTHAM "
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2007, 7:24 am
Trainer Wortham & Co., Inc., 504 F.3d 1017 (9th Cir. [read post]
21 Aug 2006, 2:05 pm
Trainer Wortham & Co., Inc., 452 F.3d 1097 (9th Cir. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
Trainer Wortham. [read post]
11 May 2007, 2:18 pm
Trainer Wortham & Co., Inc., No. 05-15704 (9th Cir. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 1:10 pm
Judge Gould writes a majority opinion that concludes by saying (in the process of remanding to the district court): "[W]e do not see how it can ever be incorrect, once the Supreme Court has vacated a circuit court decision and remanded for further assessment in light of one of its decisions, for the court of appeals simply to vacate the district court’s decision and to remand for further proceedings in the light of the pertinent Supreme Court decision. [read post]
5 May 2010, 6:59 am
Betz told the Trainer Wortham employees that she knew "nothing" about stocks and bonds. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 4:00 pm
Trainer Wortham, 519 F.3d 863 (9th Cir. 2008) that the test for determining when the statute of limitations under Section 10(b) (two years from the date of discovery and not more than five years from the date of the fraud) would begin to run was "inquiry-plus-reasonable diligence. [read post]
26 May 2009, 7:03 am
The other was Trainer Wortham & Co. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 1:15 pm
The case involved a retired art dealer who invested $2.2 million with the investor advisory group Trainer Wortham & CO. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 12:30 pm
Trainer Wortham & Co., Inc., 519 F.3d 863, (9th Cir. 2008) King v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 12:15 am
Trainer Wortham & Co. [read post]
5 May 2009, 4:00 am
., November 7, 2008 Investment Adviser Association, December 2, 2005 Trainer, Wortham & Co. [read post]
5 May 2009, 4:00 am
., November 7, 2008 Investment Adviser Association, December 2, 2005 Trainer, Wortham & Co. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 2:11 pm
The other asks the Court to clarify the two-year filing deadline for lawsuits over securities fraud; the issue is when that period starts to run — as soon as the investor knows enough to suspect fraud, as soon as a “reasonable person” would have uncovered sufficient facts to support a fraud claim, only after the investor made an investigation to check on evidence of fraud, or only when the investor has proof that a broker intended to commit fraud (Trainer… [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 10:03 pm
Trainer Wortham & Co., Inc. (9th Cir. 2006)], where the Ninth Circuit held that a judgment resulting from the client’s acceptance of an offer of judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68, even if based upon the attorney’s grossly negligent conduct, did not constitute grounds for Rule 60(b)(6) relief.She denied the motion to vacate judgment. [read post]
3 May 2010, 7:25 am
It sent back to lower courts two cases, to reconsider in the wake of rulings by the Justices last week: Trainer Wortham & Co. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 8:43 am
Trainer Wortham & Co., 452 F.3d 1097, 1099 (9th Cir. 2006) (“Rule 60(b) [Rule 4:50-1's federal doppelganger] is not intended to remedy the effects of a deliberate and independent litigation decision that a party later comes to regret through second thoughts or subsequently-gained knowledge that corrects prior erroneous legal advice of counsel. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
The first edition of “Petitions to Watch” for the October 2008 term features cases up for consideration at the Justices’ opening conference of September 29. [read post]
